Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

 

Submission Process & Publication Fees
A transparent workflow from submission to publication, aligned with best practices in scholarly publishing.
Double-Blind Peer Review Turnitin Screening APC After Acceptance
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Before submission

STEP 1 - Confirm fit before you write
Check the journal scope: speech and language disorders, audiology and hearing sciences, voice and fluency, neurogenic communication disorders, dysphagia, AAC and assistive technology, screening and community programmes, and evidence-based rehabilitation practice.
Confirm the work is original, not under review elsewhere, and not previously published. Preprints are permitted if cited with DOI and licence.
For interventional studies, confirm prospective trial registration before first enrolment. Retrospective registration is not acceptable.
Confirm ethics approval exists with committee name, approval ID, and date. A letter obtained after data collection will not satisfy screening.

STEP 2 - Select article type and lock the limits
Original Research: structured abstract, ≤250 words; main text 3,000–3,500; references 25–40; tables + figures ≤5 combined.
Systematic Review / Meta-analysis: structured abstract, ≤300 words; main text 4,000–5,000; references ≤80; tables + figures ≤6.
Narrative Review: unstructured abstract, ≤250 words; main text 3,500–4,000; references 50–70; tables + figures ≤4.
Case Report / Case Series: unstructured abstract, ≤200 words; main text 1,500–2,000; references 10–20; tables + figures ≤3.
Single-Case Experimental Design: structured abstract, ≤250 words; main text 2,500–3,000; references 20–35; tables + figures ≤5.
Short Communication: unstructured abstract, ≤150 words; main text 1,200–1,500; references ≤15; tables + figures ≤2.

STEP 3 - Match the manuscript to a reporting checklist

Randomised trial: CONSORT 2025 + TIDieR
Non-randomised intervention: TREND + TIDieR
Single-case experimental design: SCRIBE
Observational studies: STROBE
Prevalence / KAP surveys: STROBE + CHERRIES if online
Diagnostic accuracy: STARD 2015
Systematic review / meta-analysis: PRISMA 2020 + PROSPERO registration ID
Case report / case series: CARE
Qualitative: COREQ or SRQR
Instrument development / translation-validation: COSMIN + ISPOR translation guidance
Quality improvement: SQUIRE 2.0

Sex and gender reporting should follow SAGER across design, analysis, results, and interpretation.

STEP 4 - Prepare the file set (five separate uploads)
Title page as a separate file.
Blinded main manuscript with no author names, affiliations, institution names, city, ethics committee name, acknowledgements, or funding.
Tables file or embedded tables after references.
Figures as separate files, one file per figure.
Supplementary bundle: reporting checklist, ethics approval letter, consent form template, trial/PROSPERO registration proof, and corresponding-author declaration.

Before uploading, strip document metadata, remove tracked changes, and delete comments.

STEP 5 - Build the Title Page
Include full title, running title, each author’s full name and details, corresponding author contact information, author contributions using CRediT taxonomy, word count, number of tables and figures, funding statement, conflict of interest declaration, ethics approval details, registry details if applicable, AI-use disclosure, and acknowledgements where relevant.

STEP 6 - Write the Abstract and Keywords
Use a structured abstract with Background, Objective, Methods, Results, and Conclusion.
Keep the background concise.
State the objective in one sentence.
Describe design, setting, sampling, sample size, outcomes, and statistical approach in Methods.
Report sample size, key results, effect sizes, 95% CI, and exact p-values in Results.
Conclusion must be supported by the results only.
Add 4–6 MeSH keywords in alphabetical order.

STEP 7 - Write the main text (IMRAD)
Introduction should cover burden, existing evidence, the gap, and the study aim.
Methods should be detailed enough for replication, including design, setting, recruitment period, ethics, consent, sample size, eligibility criteria, instruments, procedures, interventions, outcomes, and statistical analysis.
Results should report participant flow, demographics, primary and secondary outcomes, effect sizes, and confidence intervals without interpretation.
Discussion should explain findings, compare with literature, state clinical implications, and present limitations honestly.
Conclusion should answer the objective only and avoid new data.

STEP 8 - References
Use Vancouver style with numbered references in order of first mention.
Abbreviate journal titles according to NLM.
List all authors up to six, then et al.
Include DOI where available.
Verify each reference against PubMed or the original source.
Do not cite retracted, predatory, or AI-generated sources.

STEP 9 - Tables
Use editable Word tables only.
Number tables in citation order and give each a self-explanatory title.
Use n (%), mean ± SD, or median (IQR) as appropriate.
Include test statistic, df, exact p-value, effect size, and 95% CI.
Expand abbreviations in footnotes.

STEP 10 - Figures
Use one file per figure.
Legends should be compiled at the end of the manuscript, not embedded in the image.
Clinical photographs require written consent.
Previously published figures require permission from the copyright holder.

STEP 11 - Declarations block
Add ethics approval and consent, consent for publication, data availability, competing interests, funding, author contributions, acknowledgements, and AI-use disclosure.

STEP 12 - Pre-submission self-check
Check similarity, table and figure citations, reference sequence, abstract consistency, title-page removal from the blinded file, metadata stripping, checklist completion, ethics letter attachment, registration proof, and signed corresponding-author declaration.

STEP 13 - Submit, revise, proof
Submit via OJS as corresponding author.
On revision, return a tracked-change file, a clean file, and a point-by-point response letter with page and line numbers.
At proof stage, only typographic corrections are possible.

Submission Process

The author prepares the manuscript ensuring originality, data integrity, and proper citation of all sources. All listed authors must meet internationally accepted authorship criteria. Required supporting documents including ethical/IRB approval, informed consent records, conflict of interest declarations, and funding disclosures are assembled before submission.

The author confirms the manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal simultaneously, then proceeds to submit the manuscript to JSLA.

Upon receipt, the editorial office conducts an initial assessment for scope and completeness, followed by plagiarism screening via Turnitin. Manuscripts that do not pass screening are returned to the author for revision and resubmission.

Manuscripts that clear screening enter double-blind peer review, where they are evaluated by subject-matter experts on scientific merit, methodology, and ethical standards. Based on reviewer feedback, the author may be asked to submit a major or minor revision. Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated before a final editorial decision is made.

If the manuscript is rejected, the author is notified with feedback. If the manuscript is accepted, the author receives a formal acceptance notification followed by an APC invoice. Upon confirmed payment, the manuscript proceeds to copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof preparation. The author reviews and approves the final proof before the article is published online.

Published articles remain under post-publication monitoring. Corrections may be issued for minor errors; retractions are issued in cases of confirmed serious misconduct or integrity failures.

 
Submission Process Flowchart
A simplified overview of the manuscript workflow.
START
Prepare Manuscript
Originality · data integrity · citations · authorship · supporting documents
Confirm No Duplicate Submission
Proceed only after confirming no simultaneous submission
SUBMIT TO JSLA
Submission is recorded and routed to editorial office
Initial Editorial Assessment
Scope & completeness check
Out of Scope / Incomplete
Returned to Author
Passes Assessment
Proceeds to Screening
Plagiarism Screening - Turnitin
Fail - returned for revision & resubmission · Pass - enters peer review
Double-Blind Peer Review
Evaluated on merit, methodology & ethics
Major Revision
Author revises - re-evaluation
Minor Revision
Author revises - re-evaluation
Final Editorial Decision
Rejected - author notified with feedback · Accepted - acceptance notification issued
APC Invoice Issued
Payment confirmed - production begins
Copyediting - Typesetting - Galley Proof
Author final proof approval
PUBLISHED ONLINE
Post-publication monitoring: corrections / retractions if required
END
Article Processing Charges (APC) / Publication Fee Policy
The Link Journal of Speech, Language and Audiology (JSLA) is committed to full transparency regarding all publication-related fees, in accordance with the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing as defined by DOAJ, COPE, OASPA, and WAME.
Submission Fee
No Submission Fee
Authors pay nothing at the point of manuscript submission.
Peer Review / Processing Fee
No Review or Processing Fee Editorial assessment, Turnitin screening, peer review, and decision-making are free of charge.
Article Processing Charge (APC)
PKR 25,000
USD equivalent accepted for international authors, calculated at the prevailing State Bank of Pakistan interbank rate on the invoice date.
Charged only after formal acceptance following peer review. Covers copyediting, typesetting, DOI assignment, online hosting, digital preservation/archiving, and editorial/administrative support. No additional charges apply.
Editorial Independence
Editorial decisions are made solely on scientific merit and are entirely independent of APC payment. Fee processing is administrative and has no bearing on editorial outcomes.
No Hidden or Additional Charges
No charges for colour figures, page length, supplementary files, manuscript corrections, or any other handling.
Fast-Track or Priority Review
No Priority Fees No fast track review or priority handling charges.
Waiver Policy
Partial or full waivers may be offered case-by-case for eligible authors. Waiver requests must be submitted with written justification at or immediately after acceptance. Waiver decisions are independent of editorial decisions and do not influence peer review or outcomes.
Sources of Funding
JSLA has no external source of funding. Its sole revenue source is the APC collected from accepted manuscripts.
Authors with grant/institutional support must declare this in the Funding / Acknowledgements section; the declaration will appear in the published article.
APC Payment Process
When and how the Article Processing Charge applies.
Manuscript Submitted
Free of charge: screening · peer review · editorial decision-making
Manuscript Accepted
APC invoice issued after acceptance
APC Invoice Issued - PKR 25,000
USD equivalent for international authors
Production Begins → Published Online
Copyediting · typesetting · DOI assignment · online hosting · preservation
This policy is maintained in accordance with the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (DOAJ, COPE, OASPA, WAME). Last reviewed by the editorial office of JSLA.

 

 

Articles

  1. Guidelines & Integrity: Journal Author Guidelines followed; international research integrity standards adhered to.
  2. Human Ethics: Prior IRB/ethics approval/exemption obtained; committee name, approval ID, and date stated.
  3. Informed Consent: Written consent from all participants (and parents/guardians for minors); IRB waiver for de-identified data where applicable; consent for identifiable images/quotes.
  4. Animal Ethics: Animal ethics approval obtained; approval ID reported; animal care/use standards followed.
  5. Study Registration (interventional): Registered before first enrollment; registry name and ID reported.
  6. Data Availability: Statement specifies (a) repository with DOI/URL, or (b) de-identified data on request with safeguards, or (c) justified non-sharing.
  7. Competing Interests: All authors’ interests disclosed or “no competing interests.”
  8. Funding & Role of Funder: All funding (grant numbers if any) listed; funder’s role clarified or “no role.”
  9. Author Contributions: Individual contributions detailed.
  10. Acknowledgements Consent: Acknowledged parties agreed; support described.
  11. AI Tool Disclosure: Any AI use disclosed and author-verified; no confidential data entered, or no AI used.
  12. Third-Party Permissions: Permissions/licenses secured; terms respected.
  13. Reporting Standards: Appropriate checklist followed and included as supplementary material.
  14. Originality & Prior Publication: Original; not under review elsewhere; not previously published; preprints cited with DOI/license; figures/data authentic.
  15. Availability to Editors/Reviewers: Raw data, code, protocols, and ethics documents available on request within constraints.
  16. Verification Documents: Ethics documents may be requested; false declarations may lead to rejection/retraction.
  17. Editorial Screening: May be screened for similarity, image/data manipulation, authorship, ethics, AI use, and data availability; non-compliance may lead to notices.
  18. Author Approval: All authors approved the final manuscript and this declaration.




Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.